Reocurring Itchy Blistery Rash

Oscar 2009 - The Lami

And 'from October that no one writes here anymore, and anyway I do not think him a fool fuck anyone, as the many comments on this blog has received the item sull'orrido epic film Twilight. However, the statuettes were handed over in a ceremony monotonous and somewhat disappointing. To correct this mess, I decided to create my own personal Oscars, with lots of new categories:

Film with the best qualities of time warp: The Hurt Locker

Why? Well, it seems to me that when a film of 2008 can take home the Oscar statuettes 6, 2009, the only explanation is that it can travel in time best of DeLorean Back to the Future.

Best alien movie with good and bad human: District 9

Okay, Avatar had never before seen special effects. I loved my shrimp, however, sported a history and a very original and exciting direction - and a day Today, this is a much rarer gift.

Best Fantasy: Parnassus

Since all the other crap they do and Terry Gilliam's fantasy is cool, the result seems obvious.

most overrated movie of the year: Inglourious Basterds

Tarantino was a big one. 'S why it makes me cry to see people drooling after her last film saying it is boring at the same level of that masterpiece of Pulp Fiction.

Best gay porn hardcore The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Ok, I have not seen. However, since the poster of the film where six young men ogle provocative bare-chested, I do not think it was wrong court. Yes, dear, in the case of Twilight , appearances are not deceiving.

Best Picture taken from Seinfeld: The Twilight Saga: Newman

I know you do not know ourselves ignorant Seinfeld and you can not understand. But then no one reads this blog, so who the fuck cares.

Best Film: Star Trek

Why is it so. If Spock alone is not enough as the reason, all the rest of the film is still almost as cool. Suffice to say that this film is Eric Bana implode just because a planet pulls his cock to a sorrow to Leonard Nimoy.

Waxing Strips For Genitals

Report The bone

A caress and slap these methods to train a "beast" but someone has miscalculated because we are not.

Evidently enough for some extensive work in making the report of the 'bone to be considered faithful.

E 'since the day I wrote this post that I wonder if certain events could affect the content of the programs that have overwhelmed them.

Evidently the debut recital of the transmission conducted by Gabbanelli aired Sunday on Rai Tre in complete system level playing field.

The first services are clearly an investigation on the use of public money and the collusion between government and the Mafia that responds to the common desire to defeat cancer choking Italy.

But it seems useful enough about this to have confidence indiscriminately on other important topics.

But in fact it is not so because even if the service will be commented on the crisis at the Fed and the ECB with a good premise, we end up settling the problems attributed to "loans that have not been returned" by calling into question the people who made false papers to get a house because they could not do otherwise, and reducing the fault of central banks to excessive generosity in lending the money.

But you really would have us believe that the crisis stems from people who failed to pay the mortgage, the same people in Greece is protesting because they are likely to see increased taxes on basic goods and frozen public salaries and pensions, and which should have been seen speaking to the comprehensiveness of the topical news.

How is fixed on the interest rate and the price of oil, who and how to print the money and the monetary sovereignty of this has clearly been silent.

In short, the critical service banks on the other hand there is a veiled acquittal justified by the case.

And now some fun 'as we did on TV with this service.

We must be clear about one thing in life all living beings have an instinctive that allows him to recognize the danger when he sees beyond his condition cutural.

E 'according to this characteristic that people naturally found herself to study and report chemtrails and not because they are part of a coven.

ordinary citizens and therefore potential viewers over the years have produced thousands of documents that you know where to find.

People like me who demand only the answers that as far as we are entitled do not reach or better their applications are placed on the floor once again the faith without giving any scientific explanation.

too Canneto di Caronia that was not the excessive flow of electric current in the cables causing the phenomenon does not prove scientifically that the fires were caused intentionally by flames. A

Canneto di Caronia between 2004 and 2005 there were over 150 fires inside and outside homes and also to the power supply disconnected to provoke a state of emergency and evacuation of dozens of people for more than eight months.

Now as the service proves to be the only one showing us the invalid assumptions CICAP may not be valid because the hypothesis that the cause is due to microwaves. Since it

a scientific value associations of ideas then I did when I even doing a cursory search I came across weapons such as these .

But logically could also explain what Haarp .

Also I'm on the side of truth and I want to clarify that I always thought the magic show described the service as a pure illusion, but perhaps the only truly believe it was precisely those of Cicap that to overcome the frustration once discovered the deception have seen fit to create their campaign against the windmills because even a child today would understand that a paranormal phenomenon is that until we have well- including nature.

We are far from investigations of the Little Pharma and Big Pharma than once but then when you drop pieces on the street what you can expect.

Dear my friend we all culatoni much to stoop to this vile game of double meanings that you use to hit a cowardly individual viewers. If

maybe next Sunday we will not see what the Gabbanelli hopes it will not be because of this blog and I really hope that rather than being an expression of logic or this or nothing.

My Son Showed Me His Plans

GMOs, the patent of God

E 'of these days the news that the European Commission decided to give the green light to the cultivation for industrial purposes, of genetically modified potato Amflora the chemical company BASF and the use of three species of genetically modified corn from Monsanto.

The measure is of exceptional importance, which seems to put an end to the precautionary embargo in force for twelve years, breaks the delay a bit 'too superficial and arrives as a cold shower in an atmosphere full of misinformation and confusion fueled by services TG5 like this aired on March 3 at 13:00

In the second part during the interviews from 'assume that GM will end sooner or later in our dishes, but perhaps this is not a matter of form but it is that resignation and reverence are essential for work in certain environments.

But going beyond that we see throughout the service as it is an effort to inform people unfortunately forgot to mention the word patent, much less to explain how it is linked to GMOs certain companies that are the perfect opposite of organic food.

Research is established must go on regardless and without too many obstacles but the manner in which they are employed discoveries affect us all if we had only the slightest suspicion that they are harmful to human health.

Potatoes generally has a high starch content made up for the 20% amylose and 80% of amylopectin. The latter is used for the production of paper, adhesives and textile industry exploiting the characteristic of thickening.

are not chemically or biologically, but I have learned these concepts from their site of BASF where they say the potato Amflora the gene for amylose is turned off gel slows industrial processes require a long pre-treatment.

The result is a potato starch which is made of 100% amylopectin.

What is not mentioned on the site in order to achieve this purpose was used called a gene marker nptII, which confers resistance to two aminoglycoside antibiotics, kanamycin and neomycin and that, as claimed Adiconsum Coldiretti and researchers, this resistance could be transferred to human gut bacterial flora of animals having had if it was given Amflora potato as feed and this is the second intended use in the request made by BASF to the EU as stated in their site forever.

E 'own EFSA stating that "the probability that the nptII gene is translocated from the plant to bacteria is very low" to acknowledge indirectly that the risk is there.

Quest 'GM is also sold without brokers directly with farmers who enter into a contract where you carry out an "identity preservation system" that follows the product from cultivation to harvesting, a real copyright.

In all this, considering the series of proclamations gooders these days, I can not really find something that is useful to help fight hunger in the world unless the exploited peoples and hungry do not begin to feed on paper after waited for the time it takes for the patent expires.

Once again you take advantage of people's sensitivity to justify the introduction of a product that not only enrich but only those who produce it will introduce as a trojan horse the idea that the unknown from which we come to become someone's property just because he had the idea to change a piece.

One can not entertain any fear as the background of other companies such as Monsanto and its terminator seed and the increasing prevalence of food allergies in some serious matters such as celiac disease, which feed the impression that some genetic change has already taken the against him.

yet nothing is definitive because the European Commission itself has also announced its intention to submit a proposal this summer to decide freely to individual Member States whether or not to grow GMOs on their territory. A

this respect is the important position of Minister of Agriculture Luca Zaia which has expressed its intention to initiate proceedings to ask the European Commission with which the safeguard clause to block the sale and cultivation of GM potato in our territories.

Hair Supply In Queens New York

level playing field?

E 'legitimacy to the controversy when there is complete powerless to overturn the concept of a level playing field that over the years has been gradually and deliberately misinterpreted to create in this election period by deleting some television programs.

But equal treatment is not associated with any treatment.

In this regard I found this great site written by www.difesadellinformazione.com

a level playing field

Objectivity and completeness are the criteria which should guide the information. They are mentioned in any law that is responsible for regulating the broadcasting sector in an organic way. From L. No 14 April 1975 103, passing through L. August 6, 1990 No 223 ("Law Mother") and L. May 3 2004 No 112 ("Gasparri Law"), up to the D. Lgs. July 31, 2005 No 177 ("Consolidated Broadcasting Law"), these criteria characterize the broadcasting system as a "service paramount interest." And, of course, the full observance of these criteria ensures compliance with the requirement of truth, the cornerstone of freedom of the press.

But in the '90s has made its appearance a concept designed not just to complicate the issue: the concept of a level playing field . As is known, the access of all political actors to radio-TV in conditions of equality in order to ensure that each force represented in Parliament the same opportunity to communicate with the public. A question Postas urgent as a result of the emergence of a macroscopic conflict of interest: that of Silvio Berlusconi. On the one hand, the founder and leader of a political force conspicuously represented in Parliament. Second, owns three national television networks that transmit daily Tg, programs of political communication and in-depth information without being subject to the powers of the Parliamentary Committee of Surveillance, established by Law No 103/1975, which controls only the public broadcaster Rai.

Technically, the concept of a level playing field has nothing to do with freedom of the press, because it is alien to the concept of information. Born in observance of pluralism, to ensure that all political forces equal opportunity to communicate with voters, the level playing field the relationship between political parties and voters, namely political communication. But not that relationship, mediated by the figure of a journalist, between fact and that the community is behind the ' information. "Information" and "political communication" are two opposite realities. The difference is evident both in the subject generator object. With the information, which is generated by the journalist, brings to the attention of the community made a . With the political community, which is generated by the subject political, trying to convince voters of the goodness of your own way of governing the country, announcing a assessment, biased, and as such will diverge from that of the politician belonging to a different area. This is because the purpose of political communication is to inform the viewer, but to direct the voter's choice.

And since there different ways of conceiving the operation of a democratic state, that's trying to convince voters to vote for a political force over another can be logically controlled by a principle of equality in access to media. Consequently, the utility and opportunity of a level playing field in political communication, but its ontological inapplicable to information. There is necessarily done in its uniqueness, there is only one truth. A truth in itself guaranteed by objective information, complete and impartial. The level playing field applied to information ends up misleading the public away from the truth.

The difference between information and communication policy can be seen in various stages of L. No 28/2000, which requires a level playing field of political communication in programs regardless of the time they are transmitted, and provides rules for information the election period. Article. Requires a "level playing field exposition of opinions and political positions, in political forums, debates, round tables, presentation of contradictory policy agendas, against and in interviews and in any other transmission in which the character takes major display reviews and evaluations policies. " But at the same time specifies that the rule does not apply " dissemination of information news programs."

For information programs art. 5 provides rules only for the campaign period. During this period "is may not provide, even indirectly, the voting instructions or express their preferences to vote "directors and conductors must take" appropriate behavior and impartial management of the program, so you do not exercise, which may be covert, influence on free choices of voters. "

E 'then the law to report the same level playing field only to political communication, but merely to prevent the information programs during the election campaign, will be given directions to vote and to emphasize the need for impartial their conductors.

However, it must be said that in practice legislation has imposed a distortion of the concept of information, which led to its assimilation to political communication, with the effect of widening access to the rules of even level playing field for non-electoral period. The main responsibility of this are just the two bodies responsible for ensuring the accuracy of information and respect for level playing field. For Rai, the Parliamentary Commission for general direction and supervision of broadcasting services, for private networks, the Communications Regulatory Authority ("Authority ).

By decision of 18 December 2002 the Supervisory Committee, as well as dictate specific rules for political communication, established art. 11 (under the heading "Information ") that "any director of head shall ensure that the political content of news programs to implement a fair representation of all parliamentary political views ensuring a level playing field in exposure political opinion in the national Parliament and the European Parliament . The meaning is clear. The host of a program of in-depth information, where it relates to facts relevant for policy, is basically obliged to ask politicians of each side, thus delegating the task of informing the public on the management of public affairs to people far from impartial.

By far the worst Measure March 11, 2003 the same Supervisory Commission, Article. 1 states that " All transmissions of information - from news programs of study - must comply with the completeness of the information, the plurality of views and the need for adversarial . What in the name of "pluralism [...] that must be adhered to by the licensee company as a whole and in its every act, and by its internal (divisions, networks and newspapers), and must be reflected in the individual programs evident. "

The trend continued at the level of ordinary law. First, under art. 6, paragraph 1 bed. c) L. No 112/2004 (the "Gasparri law"), then by Art. 7, paragraph 2 bed. c) Legislative Decree no. 177/2005 (the "Consolidated Broadcasting Law"). Both provisions read verbatim: "The discipline of information broadcasting, however, guarantees [...] access to all political actors to the transmission of information and propaganda and electoral politics on an equal footing treatment and fairness. "

For its part, the ' Authority has adopted this rule in 2006, also with regard to non-electoral period, extending the domestic private issuers. The Resolution No. 06.22, after stating that "the business of television news [...] shall ensure [...] access to all political actors to the transmission of information and propaganda in the electoral and political conditions of equal treatment and impartiality "(so faithfully reporting what has already been established by the" Gasparri law "and the Consolidated), art. 1, paragraph 2 °, requires "the balance of admissions " program of news and analysis.

So, while the L. No 28/2000 sets to be linked to programs of information, but only during the election campaign and still never consistent application of a level playing field , under the term of the Law Commission of the Supervisory Board el ' Authority, making a clear forcing of the legislative data, have extended the rules of a level playing field information even in non-electoral period. Objectivity, integrity, impartiality are not enough programs for information. It is always necessary to quote the Supervisory Committee the "strict respect " of the " plurality of viewpoints and the need for adversarial " even on the news, despite the art. 1, paragraph 2, L. No 28/2000 expressly prohibits the application of the programs of political communication " dissemination of information news programs."

now seen in the succession of laws and ordinances, the distortion of the concept of information reaches its climax. You get to apply to news programs (which have the task to bring out the truth ) the patterns of communication policy (where each of the contenders to the public shows its "own" truth), in the name of a pluralism whose meaning is totally misunderstood here.

If in fact the political pluralism, properly understood, wants the broadcasting system and illustrious witnesses objectively the different political realities in the country, is happening here, paradoxically, that the implementation of pluralism, misunderstood, to the detriment of truth. This can not emerge if the information is not forcibly based on objective fact but on opposing interpretations of it that provide parties with conflicting interests . It 's like to think of bringing out the truth in a process based solely on the arguments of the parties' lawyers rather than on evidence.

Among other things, the same L. No 28/2000, still in force, clearly shows how political communication should be concentrated in the election campaign. According to art. 5, paragraph 4, in the period from the convening of the electoral meetings at the close of voting, "in information broadcasts within the responsibility of a specific news organization [...] the presence of candidates, representatives of political parties and movements, Members of the Government, the Executive and Regional Councils and Local Government should be limited only to the need to ensure consistency and impartiality of information , attendance strictly prohibited "in all other transmissions . This means that the television appearances during the election campaign of politicians to be seen primarily in the interests of political communication.

From the latter rule is clear that the law gives priority to communication policy with respect to information only during the election campaign. In non-electoral period, the information must prevail over political communication. The conclusion is logical. In non-electoral period, the community should be fully informed about the facts, the results of the policy. During the campaign, however, must give themselves to each political force able to "do its own budget" of what happened and learn from the community through information, and try to convince the electorate to "draw conclusions" from the assessments of each political force.

from all this that any measures taken by the bodies responsible for monitoring the broadcasting system, where assimilate the information, anyway, political communication, are considered illegal . And the laws contained in the "Gasparri" and Consolidation Act, insofar as imposing, and always, the application information of a level playing field, so as to assimilate it to political communication, are in a strong odor of unconstitutionality to violation of Art. The first 21 of the Constitution should be rejected and countered before the Tar in the application of sanctions by the supervisory bodies and the latter, waiting and hoping for a correction of the Constitutional Court, should be at least interpreted in a manner that protects the possible freedom of information, denying the very assimilation of information to political communication.